Abdimas Ekonomika

 

Section Policy
Article

Naskah Terbuka

Diindeks

Telah di-Peer review

Peer Review Process

1. Article is the result of research or literature review.

2. Fields of study are Business Economics and Accounting

3. Articles in Indonesian and abstracts in English.

 

Publishing Frequency
Prima Ekonomika journal is published twice a year, in March and October

Open Access Policy
This journal provides open access which in principle makes research freely available to the public and will support the largest global exchange of knowledge.

Filing
OJS LOCKSS system functions as an inter-library distributed archiving system that uses this system for the purpose of creating permanent archives (for preservation and restoration). Carry on...

Publication of Ethics and Malpractice Statements

Part A: Publication and authorship
• All submitted documents are subject to a rigorous peer-review process by at least two international reviewers who are experts in the particular paper area.
• The review process is a blind peer review.
• Factors taken into account in the review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, legibility and language.
• Decisions that may include acceptance, acceptance with revision, or rejection.
• If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit the submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
• Rejected articles will not be reviewed.
• Acceptance of paper is limited by legal requirements as it applies in the future due to libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
• No research can be included in more than one publication.

Part B: the responsibility of the author
• Authors must certify that their manuscript is their original work.
• Authors must certify that the manuscript has not been published elsewhere.
• Authors must state that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
• Authors must participate in the peer review process.
• The author is obliged to provide correction or correction of errors.
• All Authors mentioned in the paper must significantly contribute to this research.
• The author must certify that all data in the paper is real and genuine.
• Authors must notify the Editor of any conflict of interest.
• Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
• Authors must report any errors they find in their published papers to the Editor.

Part C: Responsibilities of the reviewer
• The reviewer must keep all information on the paper confidential and treat it as privileged information.
• The review must be done objectively, without personal criticism from the author
• Reviewers must express their views clearly with supporting arguments
• Reviewers must identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author.
• Reviewers should also contact the Editor in Chief to note any similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of personal knowledge.
• Reviewers may not review manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest as a result of a competitive, collaborative, or other relationship, relationship, or relationship with the author, company, or institution associated with the newspaper.

Part D: editor's responsibility
• Editors have full responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
• Editors are responsible for the content and overall quality of the publication.
• Editors should always consider the needs of writers and readers when trying to improve publications.
• Editors must ensure the quality of the paper and the integrity of the academic record.
• Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when necessary.
• Editors must have a clear picture of the sources of research funding.
• Editors should base their decisions solely on their importance, originality, clarity and relevance to the publication within the scope of the publication.
• Editors may not reverse their decision or cancel previous editors without serious reason.
• Editors must maintain the anonymity of reviewers.
• Editors must ensure that all research material they publish complies with internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
• Editors should only accept papers if they are reasonably certain.
• Editors must act if they suspect wrongdoing, whether a paper was published or unpublished, and make all reasonable efforts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the matter.
• Editors must not reject papers based on suspicion, there should be evidence of error.
• Editors must not allow conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.

 

Check Plagiarism
Plagiarism screening will be carried out using Plagiarism Detect

Plagiarism is the exposure of another person’s thoughts or words as though they were your own, without permission, credit, or acknowledgment, or because of failing to cite the sources properly. Plagiarism can take diverse forms, from literal copying to paraphrasing the work of another. To accurately judge whether an author has plagiarized, we emphasize the following possible situations:

• An author can literally copy another author’s work- by copying word by word, in whole or in part, without permission, acknowledge or citing the original source. This practice can be identified by comparing the original source and the manuscript/work who is suspected of plagiarism.
• Substantial copying implies an author to reproduce a substantial part of another author, without permission, acknowledge, or citation. The substantial term can be understood both in terms of quality as quantity, being often used in the context of Intellectual property. Quality refers to the relative value of the copied text in proportion to the work as a whole.
• Paraphrasing involves taking ideas, words, or phrases from a source and crafting them into new sentences within the writing. This practice becomes unethical when the author does not properly cite or does not acknowledge the original work/author. This form of plagiarism is the more difficult form to be identified.

Copy Edit and Correction
Every article received by Prima Ekonomika becomes the object of the Grammarly handwriting improvement program conducted by the Prima Ekonomika Editorial Board

Reference management
Every article received by Prima Ekonomika uses reference management software. e.g. Mendeley or Zotero

paper format

Author Guidelines

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

1. The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor
2. The article adheres to the Author Guidelines. The submission file using the "Jurnal Prima Ekonomika" template is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.

3. References have been accompanied by DOI or URLs if available online and cited using the reference tool (such as Endnote, Mendeley, Zotero, etc.)

4. This article has been confirmed to have no conflicts of interest, and all authors in this article agree to process in Jurnal Bioedukatika.
5. This article has been through a plagiarism check with a responsible application and is declared not to exceed the "Jurnal Bioedukatika" limits.
6. The article has been written in English and has gone through an accountable proofreading process.